Flight Safety Logo




FSF E-Mail Subscription Service

This is a free service to receive notification of the most current Flight Safety Foundation publications, news releases, seminars and other special events by e-mail. Please provide your contact information and select your areas of interest in the fields below. Fields marked with an * and in red are required.

After submitting this form you will receive a confirmation e-mail - click on the link contained in the e-mail to confirm you are subscribed to our E-mail Subscription Service.

Already a subscriber? Login here to change your status or info.

Email *

First Name *

Last Name *

Job Title *

Company *

Business Type *


Address

City

State

Country

Zip

Work Phone

Subscribe to:
AeroSafety World
Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar (CASS)
European Aviation Safety Seminar (EASS)
International Air Safety Seminar (IASS)
News Releases
Other Events
Special Announcements and Other Information

Privacy Policy: Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) is committed to using responsibly any private information submitted by visitors to its site: flightsafety.org. The Foundation is the sole owner of information collected on this site and will not sell, share or rent this information to others in ways different from what is disclosed in its privacy statement. For more information, review our entire Privacy Statement.

FSF Statement on Concorde Verdict

“The Concorde criminal verdict announced today in France is a disappointment, but the fact that this trial was even held is the real concern. Aviation safety professionals know that the voluntary exchange of data between industry, regulators, and operators is key to identifying potential safety concerns and is the reason why the safety record of the aviation industry is unparalleled. When the judicial system gets involved, as it has in this case, it chills this vital cooperation, making it harder for a safety professional to prevent it from happening again.   Prosecutorial abuse of discretion is on our most wanted list to eliminate. The assignment of blame should not override the public’s need for a safe aviation system.  This is no way to honor the victims of an aviation tragedy.”

 

Posted 12/6/2010

Comments

The verdict is really unbelievable

It is contrary to all reasonableness: The guy who carried out a work, of course, he did not do a good job. However, what about the quality system, why is it not procedures in place to check and double check work that is vital to safety? And, what about the designers of this great plane, how come it is possible to design a plane that is not robust for a "normal" event like a tyre that explodes? And still get away with it?