Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • AeroSafety World
  • Events
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Mental Health and Wellness
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (GAPPRI)
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
    • ASN Accident Dashboards
    • ASN Accident Data
    • Videos
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • AeroSafety World
  • Events
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Mental Health and Wellness
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (GAPPRI)
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
    • ASN Accident Dashboards
    • ASN Accident Data
    • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Aviation Safety Experts
  • AeroSafety World
  • AeroSafety World October 2014
  • Measures of Safety

DataLink

Measures of Safety

by Linda Werfelman | October 6, 2014

Countries in the Middle East with oversight systems that have been audited by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) have scored above the world average for their effective implementation (EI) of eight critical elements (CEs) of aviation safety, the ICAO Regional Aviation Safety Group–­Middle East (RASG-MID) says.

The group said, in its second MID Region Annual Safety Report,1 that the 13 audited Middle East states2 had an average EI score of 69.85 percent, compared with the worldwide average of 61.70 percent, (Figure 1).

The report said the EI scores were derived from results of ICAO’s Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP), which showed that the region’s highest average scores were in areas involving licensing and certification (CE6), operating regulations (CE2), primary aviation legislation (CE1) and technical guidance materials (CE5). The lowest average score was 46.49 percent in qualification and training of the technical staff involved in carrying out regulatory functions (CE4), the report said.3

The report’s objective was to use the safety information gathered from various sources —Boeing, the International Air Transport Association (IATA), ICAO, airline operators and individual states — to “identify the main aviation safety risks in the Middle East Region in order to deploy mitigation actions for enhancing aviation safety in a coordinated manner. …

“Every entity involved in aviation safety collects safety data and produces safety information with a different perspective.”

Five states — not identified by name in the report — provided individual answers to ICAO requests for data on safety occurrences within their jurisdictions. Their information identified the most frequently reported occurrences as air traffic control–related reports, including reports about conflicting traffic and airspace deviations; diversions; level busts (altitude deviations); unstable approaches; controlled flight into terrain; and wake turbulence.

The primary root causes, according to the information supplied by the five states, were human errors, wind shear and other weather conditions, and aircraft system malfunctions.

According to reports by airlines to IATA’s Middle East and North Africa Office, laser attacks (also called illuminations or strikes) on their aircraft were the most frequent occurrences in 2013, when 40 attacks were reported, up from nine in 2011.4 Air traffic management factors accounted for 15 occurrences in 2013, and communication and navigation accounted for nine, the report said (Figure 2). 

Overall, the accident rate in the MID region in 2012 was 2.13 per million flight sectors, compared with 2.06 per million worldwide, the report said, citing IATA data (Figure 3). That MID number represented a decline from 11.78 accidents per million sectors in 2009. Two accidents occurred in the MID region in 2012; that was the lowest annual number in the 2008–2012 study period cited in that section of the report.

Fatal accidents declined in the MID region over the same five-year period from 4.03 fatal accidents per million departures in 2008 to 0.71 per million departures in 2012 (Figure 4).

Runway and taxiway excursions occurred more frequently than any other type of accident and accounted for nearly 20 percent of all accidents in 2008–2012, the report said. Loss of control–in flight (LOC-I) accidents were next-most frequent and accounted for about 17 percent of all accidents (Figure 5). Worldwide, runway/taxiway excursions, gear-up landing/gear collapse and ground damage all occurred more often than LOC-I accidents. In both the MID region and the world, accidents were more likely during landing than in any other phase of flight.

However, both in the MID region and worldwide, more fatal accidents involved LOC‑I than any other category, followed by controlled flight into terrain and runway/taxiway excursions (Figure 6). Fatal accidents occurred most often during the landing phase in the MID region but during approach worldwide. 

Notes

  1. RASG-MID. MID Regional Annual Safety Report, second edition. January 2014.
  2. The 13 audited states listed include Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and UAE. The report did not identify the three other audited states.
  3. ICAO. USOAP CSA Audit Results — Glossary.
  4. The report said that, when using IATA data for the Middle East and North Africa, the authors attempted to narrow the data to include only the 15 states of the Middle East region — the 10 listed in Note 2, plus Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria and Yemen.

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

1920 Ballenger Ave., 4th Floor, Alexandria, VA 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Work with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2025 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn