Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • AeroSafety World
  • Events
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Mental Health and Wellness
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (GAPPRI)
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
    • ASN Accident Dashboards
    • ASN Accident Data
    • Videos
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • AeroSafety World
  • Events
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Mental Health and Wellness
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (GAPPRI)
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
    • ASN Accident Dashboards
    • ASN Accident Data
    • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Aviation Safety Experts
  • AeroSafety World
  • AeroSafety World May 2017
  • Refining the Search

Flight Ops

Refining the Search

Malaysia Airlines plans real-time flight tracking of its fleet.

by Linda Werfelman | May 31, 2017

Just over three years since the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, the airline has signed an agreement calling for real-time, satellite-based tracking of its aircraft.

The agreement provides for all Malaysia Airlines aircraft to have access to flight tracking data delivered by SitaOnAir’s AIRCOM FlightTracker, with additional data from Aireon’s automatic dependent surveillance–broadcast (ADS-B) and FlightAware’s multiple sources around the world, according to the mid-April announcement of the agreement.

“By incorporating this data, Malaysia Airlines’ aircraft operations center will receive real-time position updates of its airborne fleet globally,” SitaOnAir said. “Aireon’s space-based ADS-B data will also resolve any existing data feed coverage gaps that remain, particularly over oceanic and remote airspace, where there is currently no surveillance.”

Capt. Izham Ismail, Malaysia Airlines’ chief operating officer, noted that real-time, worldwide tracking “has long been a goal of the aviation community,” and that the airline is “proud to be the first” to adopt this solution.

Other airlines also have implemented satellite-based flight tracking using other systems. Qatar Airways said in late April that it already has activated real-time worldwide tracking using a satellite-based system supplied by Inmarsat. The tracking system is being used on all of the airline’s existing flights and will be expanded to cover all future flights, the airline said.

The March 8, 2014, disappearance of Flight 370, a Boeing 777 en route from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing with 239 passengers and crew, prompted not only an intensive search for the aircraft but also the adoption by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) of new flight tracking provisions. Those provisions call for airlines to adopt 15-minute tracking intervals beginning in November 2018. A stricter mandate will require one-minute intervals for airliner tracking beginning in January 2021.

When the ICAO Council adopted the requirement in November 2015, it emphasized the operator’s “responsibility to track its aircraft throughout its area of operations.” The time interval will be a requirement for aircraft with a takeoff mass of at least 45,500 kg (100,309 lb) when flying over oceanic areas and as a recommendation for aircraft with a takeoff mass of 27,000 kg (59,524 lb).

The 2021 requirement — adopted in March 2016 — calls for the autonomous transmission of information “from which a position can be determined at least once every minute when in a distress condition,” ICAO said. The time interval will be a requirement for new airplanes with a takeoff mass greater than 27,000 kg beginning Jan. 1, 2021, and a recommendation for new airplanes with a takeoff mass of more than 5,700 kg (12,566 lb).

The 2021 requirement also calls for aircraft to be equipped with “a means to have flight recorder data recovered and made available in a timely manner” and for the extension of cockpit voice recordings to 25 hours.

When the measure was adopted, ICAO said that this requirement will “provide a high probability of locating an accident site to within a 6 nm [11 km] radius.”

ICAO Council President Olumuyiwa Benard Aliu added that the provisions would “ensure that, in the case of an accident, the location of the site will be known immediately to within 6 nm and that investigators will be able to access the aircraft’s flight recorder data promptly and reliably.”

In adopting the new reporting requirements, ICAO cited the disappearances of two airplanes — Flight 370 and Air France Flight 447.

Flight 447 was an Airbus A330 that crashed into the Atlantic Ocean on June 1, 2009, while en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris with 228 passengers and crew. The wreckage was not located until April 3, 2011, when unmanned submarines found parts of the airplane on the ocean floor.1

The French Bureau d’EnquĂȘtes et d’Analyses (BEA) said the accident was the culmination of a series of events, beginning with the blockage of the airplane’s pitot probes by ice crystals, which resulted in unreliable airspeed information, and ending with the crew’s failure to recognize that the airplane was stalling, and “consequently, the lack of any actions that would have made recovery possible.”

Both airplanes disappeared during en route periods when their crews were not in contact with air traffic control and the aircraft were not visible on radar.

The search for Flight 370 continued for nearly three years until it was suspended on Jan. 17, 2017, when the last search vessel left the designated search area in the southern Indian Ocean. In the years following the crash, search vessels had covered 120,000 sq km (46,332 sq mi) of the ocean floor, according to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB), which has been in charge of the underwater phase of the search.

That search focused on an area in the southern Indian Ocean that experts believed was where the airplane entered the ocean. That area — about 1,870 km (1,161 mi) southwest of Perth — is within the Australian search and rescue zone.

Although the main body of wreckage has not been found, several pieces of the 777 have been discovered on beaches bordering the Indian Ocean. The ATSB says that some of those pieces have been “positively identified as parts belonging to MH370, [and] others are almost certainly from the aircraft but lack the identifying numbers or features to eliminate any doubt.”

The ATSB emphasizes that the search has been suspended, not ended, and that any decision to resume will be made by the three governments that have been involved in the effort to locate the wreckage — Malaysia, China and Australia.

“The aspiration to locate MH370 continues to exist,” the ATSB said. “Should credible new information emerge which can be used to identify the specific location of the aircraft, consideration will be given in determining next steps.”

Notes

  1. BEA. “Final Report: On the Accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 Registered F-GZCP, Operated by Air France, Flight AF 447, Rio de Janeiro–Paris.” July 2012.
  2. ATSB. “The Search: Frequently Asked Questions.”

Featured image — composite: Susan Reed; map: © Natural Earth | Wikimedia Commons CC-PD 1.0
Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777: © Laurent Errera | Wikimedia Commons CC-BY-SA 2.0

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Related Content

2019 FSF Press Releases

Flight Safety Foundation, Aireon Forge Partnership to Advance Global Aviation Safety

MADRID – Flight Safety Foundation has announced an agreement with Aireon to collaborate on applying…

by FSF Communications Staff

Accident Investigation, Cover Story

‘Manual Inputs’

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370’s departure from its planned route likely was intentional, investigators say.

by Linda Werfelman

News, Accident/Incident Investigation

Search Ending for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

The private firm that had been searching the seabed beneath the Indian Ocean for the…

by FSF Editorial Staff

Read more articles

1920 Ballenger Ave., 4th Floor, Alexandria, VA 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Work with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2025 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn