Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Aviation Safety Experts
  • Industry Updates
  • Limited Visual Cues Cited in A320 Runway Excursion

News, Runway Safety (approach and landing), Accident/Incident Investigation

Limited Visual Cues Cited in A320 Runway Excursion

by FSF Editorial Staff | April 26, 2018

Rain, poorly functioning windshield wipers and a lack of runway centerline lighting resulted in limited visual cues that led to an Airbus A320’s runway excursion at Toronto/Lester B. Pearson International Airport in 2017, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) says.

In its final report on the accident, released Wednesday, the TSB said that the poor visibility “reduced the cues available to recognize the aircraft’s drift in time to correct the trajectory or to execute a safe go-around.”

None of the 119 passengers and six crewmembers was injured in the Feb. 25, 2017, runway excursion, which caused minor damage to the A320’s left outboard wheel and left engine cowling, the report said. The excursion came at the end of a flight from Halifax, Nova Scotia, after the airplane began deviating to the right of the runway centerline, the report said, adding that the airplane traveled nearly 2,400 ft through the grass parallel to the runway, striking five runway edge lights before returning to the pavement.

Accident investigators determined that during final approach, with the airplane less than 30 ft above ground level and lined up with the runway centerline, “a right roll command input caused the aircraft to enter a shallow right bank and start drifting to the right,” the report said.

Because of the limited visual cues, the crew had difficulty determining the airplane’s lateral position, the report added, and “the severity of the drift was not recognized until the aircraft was less than 10 feet above ground and rapidly approaching the runway edge, which left limited time to correct the aircraft’s trajectory before contacting the surface.”

The report said that after the accident, Air Canada issued additional guidance to flight crews on lateral drifts and lateral runway excursions, developed a simulator drift training scenario and began a program of inspections for windshield wiper tension.

 

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Related Content

Accident/Incident Investigation, News

Faulty Mental Model

The ATSB says a pilot’s mistaken belief that an approaching 737 would land behind his Caravan was a factor in a separation occurrence.

by Linda Werfelman

Accident Investigation, Human Factors, News

An ‘Altered Perception of Risk’

The pilot had conducted similar steep climbing turns after takeoffs in the past, the TSB said.

by Linda Werfelman

Accident/Incident Investigation, News, Unmanned Aircraft

An Unrecognized Conflict

A small airplane was slightly damaged and a drone was destroyed in a collision near a Toronto airport.

by Linda Werfelman

Read more articles

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250, Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Flight Safety Foundation on Twitter

Enhance your #runwaysafety skills with our exclusive workshop on Air Navigation Services and #Aerodrome! Join us to… https://t.co/QCK7uOI0D9

March 11, 2023

Follow @flightsafety

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • Global Safety Information Project
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Work with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2023 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn