Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Aviation Safety Experts
  • Industry Updates
  • TSB Recommends Runway-Safety Changes at Toronto

News, Runway Safety (Conflicts)

TSB Recommends Runway-Safety Changes at Toronto

by FSF Editorial Staff | February 5, 2019

runway incursion example

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB), citing 27 runway incursions in just over five years at Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport, has issued a series of recommendations to improve safety at two closely spaced parallel runways.

The four recommendations, issued last week, include one that calls for Nav Canada to alter its phraseology to ensure that safety-critical transmissions “are more compelling to flight crews in order for crews to take the safest course of action.”

Two recommendations are for Transport Canada and the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration to work with operators to develop standard operating procedures calling for crews to wait until after their landing aircraft clears all active runways to begin post-landing checks.

The fourth recommendation says that the Greater Toronto Airports Authority should change the taxiway layout at the airport’s South Complex to limit the risk of runway incursions between the parallel runways.

The TSB investigation found that all 27 incursions occurred on the inner runway (06L/24R), after airplanes had landed on the outer runway (06R/24L) and were on a rapid-exit taxiway between the runways. The rapid-exit taxiways have characteristics that differ from nearly all other major North American airports, the TSB said, adding that the differences mean that the hold lines “are not where crews are expecting to see them.”

The investigation also determined that, because of “hot spot” designations on airport charts, crews knew about the increased risk of runway incursions. Nevertheless, “that guidance did not bring crews’ attention to specific strategies to mitigate the risk of incursion,” the TSB said. “Instead, crews followed their standard operating procedures and initiated their post-landing actions immediately after exiting the runway, taking their attention away from other, more critical tasks such as identifying the hold line. The timing of those tasks distracted the crew at a point when limited time was available to recognize the visual cues requiring them to stop, and contributed to their overlooking those cues.”

Photo caption: Example of a possible runway incursion between two aircraft at Toronto/Lester B. Pearson International Airport. Source: TSB

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Related Content

Human Factors, News, Runway Safety

‘Uncomfortable’

A veteran pilot accustomed to flying IFR expected to be directed to the usual runway for a VFR departure, the ATSB says.

by Linda Werfelman

In-depth Feature, Runway Safety

False Expectations

The ATSB says expectation bias played a role in the failure of a Saab 340B’s pilots to notice another aircraft on the runway or hear its radio transmissions.

by Linda Werfelman

Cover Story, Runway Safety

Tackling Runway Risks

Safety experts outline plans of attack to curb runway excursions and incursions.

by Frank Jackman

Read more articles

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250, Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Flight Safety Foundation on Twitter

How can we ensure #aviation is both sustainable and safe? A firebrand panel of industry leaders shares their insigh… https://t.co/7ZVY8244hI

February 6, 2023

Follow @flightsafety

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • Global Safety Information Project
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Work with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2023 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn