Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • AeroSafety World
  • Events
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Mental Health and Wellness
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (GAPPRI)
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
    • ASN Accident Dashboards
    • ASN Accident Data
    • Videos
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • AeroSafety World
  • Events
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Mental Health and Wellness
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (GAPPRI)
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
    • ASN Accident Dashboards
    • ASN Accident Data
    • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Aviation Safety Experts
  • Industry Updates
  • U.S. Agency to Probe FAA Oversight Practices

News, Safety Oversight, 737 MAX

U.S. Agency to Probe FAA Oversight Practices

by AeroSafety World Editorial Staff | February 11, 2020

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) oversight and certification practices will be the subject of a review by a government watchdog agency, which says it is especially interested in the process used by the FAA to establish pilot training requirements for the Boeing 737 MAX.

The Department of Transportation’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) said Monday that the review, which will begin later this month at the request of members of the U.S. House of Representatives, was prompted by concerns associated with the fatal crashes of two 737 MAX airplanes.

The crashes involved Lion Air Flight 610 on Oct. 29, 2018, after departure from Jakarta, Indonesia, and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 on March 10, 2019, after departure from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. All passengers and crew in both airplanes ─ a total of 346 people ─ were killed.

The FAA certified the 737 MAX in March 2017.

“These fatal accidents have drawn widespread attention to FAA’s oversight and certification practices, including the agency’s process for establishing pilot training requirements for the aircraft,” the OIG said. “For example, at the time of the October 2018 fatal accident, pilots were reportedly unaware of the new automation system ─ known as the maneuvering characteristics augmentation system (MCAS) ─ that Boeing included on the MAX aircraft to improve aircraft performance.”

The report by the Indonesian accident investigation authority said that a contributing factor to the crash was “the pilots’ response to erroneous activation of MCAS.” The pilots’ actions raised “international concerns about the role of pilot training” in the accident, the OIG said.

In response, leaders of the Aviation Subcommittee of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure asked the OIG to review domestic and international pilot training standards for commercial passenger airplanes, including training on automation.

The OIG said it would conduct that review and also examine requirements by other civil aviation authorities regarding pilot training on the use of flight deck automation.

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Related Content

News, Flight Training, Safety Regulation

FAA Orders Revamped Training for Pilots

U.S. air carriers will be required to provide their pilots with additional training as part…

by AeroSafety World Editorial Staff

News, Flight Training, Safety Review

U.S. Lawmakers Want Evaluation of Foreign Pilot Training

The U.S. House of Representatives Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and its aviation subcommittee want a…

by FSF Editorial Staff

News, Flight Training

Qantas Incident Prompts New Stall Warning Recovery Training

In the aftermath of the in-flight upset of a Qantas Boeing 747 en route from…

by FSF Editorial Staff

Read more articles

1920 Ballenger Ave., 4th Floor, Alexandria, VA 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Work with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2025 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn