Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Aviation Safety Experts
  • AeroSafety World
  • AeroSafety World February 2016
  • Is There Really a No.1?

InSight

Is There Really a No.1?

by Mark Millam | February 12, 2016

For those who manage risk in aviation organizations, it can be irritating when simplistic news reports start hitting the street about who is “No. 1 in airline safety.” While the airlines that receive the highest marks probably don’t complain, you can bet they aren’t being very boastful, either. They know the challenges in monitoring everything in their operations. They know about the layers of protection they depend on, what they’ve built into their systems and integrated with other organizations, and they know that at any given time, those layers could be penetrated by some innocuous event or compromised by somebody or something beyond their control.

It’s that kind of attitude that makes a big difference in this industry. It’s why the most safety-conscious airlines are never satisfied with the protections they have built, and they are always looking for a better way to reduce their risks. It’s why the collective efforts of all airlines, their business partners and the regulatory community have produced levels of safety that are unmatched in any other mode of transportation.

At Flight Safety Foundation, we are serious about raising the bar on safety. We know that airlines, airports, manufacturers, civil aviation authorities, investigative authorities and air traffic service providers constantly are looking for better ways to understand and enhance safety protections. The data that need to be examined to do this come from a variety of sources — voluntary safety reporting programs, flight data monitoring systems, air traffic controller safety reporting systems, radar data, and accident investigation reports, to name only a few.

Everyone who has a hand in looking at safety data collection and processing systems knows there is a lot of data to manage and analyze — way beyond the latest accident rates or findings of government inspections. Ongoing equipment maintenance processes and training programs are managing risk and being tweaked all the time to produce higher levels of reliability and safety. Collaboration on safety data is likely to go much further in the future than it has in the past. We are researching this trend in the FSF Global Safety Information Project (GSIP) initiative. We know that even the best in the industry want to find a better perspective on safety data because they know that the data insights they currently have are not enough.

The reality is that many airlines have gone long stretches of time without an accident-caused fatality — so many that this metric is no longer an accomplishment that sets them apart in safety performance. I am not knocking the efforts and intentions of consumer groups that produce safety ratings, but the level of sophistication in data collection and analysis required by our industry far eclipses what such outside groups have produced.

Airline safety experts know well what data are needed to manage their risks in flight operations, so how can they accept the judgment of groups that have far less information and insight than they do?

Mark Millam is Vice President, Technical at Flight Safety Foundation.

InSight is a forum for expressing personal opinions about issues of importance to aviation safety and for stimulating constructive discussion, pro and con, about the expressed opinions. Send your comments to Frank Jackman, vice president, communications, Flight Safety Foundation, 701 N. Fairfax St., Suite 250, Alexandria VA 22314-2058 USA or jackman@flightsafety.org.

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Related Content

COVID-19, Flight Training, News

Safety News in Brief

The FAA has rejected Republic Airways’ request for an exemption to the 1,500-hour rule.

by FSF Editorial Staff

accident data, News

By the Numbers

Boeing statistics show the number of accidents increased in 2021 over the previous year, but fatal accidents and fatalities declined.

by FSF Editorial Staff

Flight Ops, News, safety data, uncrewed aircraft

Safety News in Brief

ATSB reports a new occurrence of an airliner’s pitot tube covers being removed minutes before takeoff.

by FSF Editorial Staff

Read more articles

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250, Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Flight Safety Foundation on Twitter

How can we ensure #aviation is both sustainable and safe? A firebrand panel of industry leaders shares their insigh… https://t.co/7ZVY8244hI

February 6, 2023

Follow @flightsafety

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • Global Safety Information Project
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Work with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2023 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn