Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Awards
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • About AeroSafety World
    • Archived Publications
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Go-Around Project
    • GSIP Toolkits
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Podcasts
    • Special Reports
    • Unreliable Airspeed
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Awards
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • About AeroSafety World
    • Archived Publications
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Go-Around Project
    • GSIP Toolkits
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Podcasts
    • Special Reports
    • Unreliable Airspeed
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Front Page
  • Industry Updates
  • ATSB Seeks ICAO Runway Lighting Standard Review

News, Runway Safety

ATSB Seeks ICAO Runway Lighting Standard Review

by FSF Editorial Staff | May 16, 2019

A disproportionate number of runway side excursions — veer-offs — that occur in reduced visibility also occur on wider-than-usual runways, especially those without centerline lighting, the Australian Transportation Safety Bureau (ATSB) says.

The ATSB said, in a report released Wednesday about a Dec. 16, 2016, veer-off involving a Boeing 737 at Darwin Airport, that it reviewed 15 similar runway excursions in Australia, Canada and elsewhere and found that all 15 occurred at night, in reduced visibility and on runways without centerline lights.

Eleven of the 15 veer-offs occurred on runways wider than 50 m (164 ft), and 13 occurred during a Category 1 instrument landing system approach, the report said. The other two occurred during non-precision approaches on runways narrower than 50 m. In addition, 13 veer-offs involved high-capacity air transport aircraft — those with more than 38 seats.

As a result of its review, the ATSB recommended that the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) review its runway lighting standards.

In its report on the Darwin accident, the ATSB said that accident investigators determined that the Virgin Australia 737-800 had touched down more than 20 m (66 ft) to the right of the runway centerline and continued toward the side of the runway. The right main landing gear ran off the runway edge for 400 m (1,312 ft), destroying six runway lights before being returned to the runway. No one was injured, and the 737 received minor damage.

The investigators found that the crosswind had increased slightly “at a critical time a few seconds before touchdown, and the crew were not aware how far the aircraft had deviated,” the report said.

“The two rows of lights alongside Runway 29 at Darwin are further apart than what a flight crew would normally encounter, due to the relatively wide runway. The ATSB found that, in the absence of centreline lighting, this characteristic affected the crew’s ability to detect and correct the aircraft’s deviation.”

After the investigation, Virgin Australia and Darwin Airport both implemented several safety actions, including providing flight crews with more information about the specific risks of a nighttime approach to Darwin in reduced visibility, the report said.

The report noted that the ATSB had recommended the installation of centerline lights at Darwin after a veer-off in 2003. Both the Australian Department of Defence and Darwin International Airport, which jointly own the airport, have said they will consider the recommendation during future work on the runway.

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Related Content

On Record

Two Out, Same Side

Debris liberated by one engine’s catastrophic failure knocked out the other engine.

by Mark Lacagnina

Runway Safety (approach and landing), President's Message

Perpetual Problem

On July 1, a SpiceJet Boeing 737 overran a runway while landing at Mumbai (India)…

by Dr. Hassan Shahidi | President and CEO

Runway Safety (approach and landing), Airport Ops

Lighting the Path

Report shows runway veer-offs may have a link to wide runways without centerline lighting.

by Linda Werfelman

Read more articles

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250, Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Flight Safety Foundation on Twitter

This year at Flight Safety Foundation we're thankful for dedicated aviation safety advocates and professionals arou… https://t.co/4JmE7b7V1T

November 27, 2019

Follow @flightsafety

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • Global Safety Information Project
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2019 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn