Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Aviation Safety Experts
  • Industry Updates
  • Flight Safety Foundation Praises U.S. FAA and Australia’s CASA for Safety Compliance and Enforcement Reform

2015 FSF Press Releases, Safety Oversight

Flight Safety Foundation Praises U.S. FAA and Australia’s CASA for Safety Compliance and Enforcement Reform

by Flight Safety Foundation | October 26, 2015

Hunter Valley NSW, Australia, October 26, 2015 – The Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) announced today its endorsement of the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority’s (CASA) recent changes in enforcement and regulatory philosophy focused on performance-based and “Just Culture” approaches to compliance and enforcement.

Addressing the National Convention of the Regional Aviation Association of Australia in Hunter Valley, Australia on 23 October 2015, FSF’s general counsel Kenneth Quinn praised FAA and CASA.

“These leading national civil aviation authorities are embarking on enlightened best practices to compliance and enforcement by emphasizing the importance of proportionality, discretion, and remedial action to address safety issues. The vast majority of deviation from the rules are due to human factors, honest mistakes, or diminished skills, where training and education are appropriate corrective measures, not punishment or enforcement,” Quinn said. “All countries should closely examine CASA’s and FAA’s new, forward-thinking compliance and enforcement philosophies and get away from outdated ‘cop-on-the-beat’ mentality, where inspectors are looking to write up violations, instead of helping organizations and individuals become compliant and enhance safety.”

The FAA’s new Compliance Philosophy Order, issued on September 3, 2015, Order 2150.3B, Change 9, recognizes that the FAA’s goal is to use the most effective means to return an entity holding a certificate or approval to full compliance and prevent recurrence.  If a person is willing and able to comply with regulatory standards, FAA is now willing to use non-punitive “compliance actions” to address the underlying root cause through airman training, counseling, or education, with agreed-upon corrective actions. When FAA determines that compliance actions are deemed insufficient, the new policy emphasizes the use of “Warning Notices” or “Letters of Correction” to set forth the facts and circumstances of noncompliance and a specific agreement to institute corrective actions within a specified time frame.  Legal enforcement action with findings of violation remain appropriate for willful or flagrant violations, or a refusal to cooperate in remedial actions.

In the same spirit, CASA’s new “Regulatory Philosophy” issued on September 15, 2015 sets out ten key principles to guide their regulatory powers.  The principles include embracing a “Just Culture” approach, taking actions that are appropriate and in proportion to the circumstances, exercising discretion fairly, avoiding punitive measures, with a focus on encouragement of training and education, with a view to remedying identified shortcomings and correcting deficiencies.

“These modern safety management enforcement philosophies, which need extensive training and ‘buy in’ from front-line inspectors to senior management can rapidly re-establish trust between the regulator and the regulated, and encourage people to come forward to admit mistakes, turning them into teaching moments that can save lives,” Quinn continued

The inaugural meeting of FSF’s Legal Advisory Committee, composed of leading aviation lawyers from around the world, will be held at FSF’s upcoming International Air Safety Summit in Miami Beach, FL (Nov 2-4, 2015).  The Committee will further exploring implementation of new ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for safety information protection, including new model “advance arrangements” among safety agencies, law enforcement, and prosecutors in the wake of a crash.

###

Flight Safety Foundation (www.flightsafety.org) is an independent, non-profit, international organization engaged in research, education, advocacy and publishing to improve aviation safety. The Foundation’s mission is to be the leading voice of safety for the global aerospace community.

Contact: Emily McGee, +1 703 739 6700, ext. 126; mcgee@flightsafety.org

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Related Content

News, Safety Regulation

Allegiant Faces Possible Penalty of $715,438

Allegiant Air allegedly operated a McDonnell Douglas MD-88 on more than two dozen flights after improper engine maintenance, according to the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which has proposed that…

by FSF Editorial Staff

News, Safety Standards

FAA Proposes $1.4 Million Fine Against Operator of Airports in Virgin Islands

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Friday proposed a fine of nearly $1.47 million against the Virgin Islands Port Authority (VIPA) for alleged safety violations at the airports in St.…

by FSF Editorial Staff

InSight

Procedural Drift: Causes and Consequences

Procedures, policies and checklists are an effective way to ensure safety-related tasks are being conducted in a standardized, pragmatic way. They also are, in many cases, a regulatory requirement. But…

by Robert I. Baron

Read more articles

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250, Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Flight Safety Foundation on Twitter

Native English speakers can alter word choices and other speaking habits to help non-native speakers understand.

R… https://t.co/pGIWuvdO8p

January 30, 2023

Follow @flightsafety

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • Global Safety Information Project
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Work with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2023 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn