Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • AeroSafety World
  • Events
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Mental Health and Wellness
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (GAPPRI)
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
    • ASN Accident Dashboards
    • ASN Accident Data
    • Videos
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
    • Founders
    • Mission
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Award & Scholarship Programs
    • Work with Us
    • Join Us
  • AeroSafety World
  • Events
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • Mental Health and Wellness
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (GAPPRI)
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • Global Safety Assessment Project
    • Learning From All Operations
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Special Reports
    • ASN Accident Dashboards
    • ASN Accident Data
    • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Aviation Safety Experts
  • Industry Updates
  • NTSB Urges Changes in Aircraft Design Assessments

News, Safety Recommendation

NTSB Urges Changes in Aircraft Design Assessments

by FSF Editorial Staff | September 26, 2019

Citing ongoing investigations of two Boeing 737 MAX accidents that killed 346 people, the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) today issued seven recommendations that call on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to incorporate into its aircraft design safety assessments an evaluation of how pilots will respond to multiple alerts.

The new safety recommendations were developed through an examination of the safety assessments that were conducted as part of the original design of the maneuvering characteristics augmentation system (MCAS), which, according to preliminary investigations, activated in response to erroneous information about the airplane’s angle of attack.

All Boeing MAX airplanes have been grounded since March 13, following the March 10 crash of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 after takeoff from Addis Ababa. The earlier accident involved Lion Air Flight 610, which crashed after takeoff from Jakarta, Indonesia, on Oct. 29, 2018. The crashes killed all passengers and crew on both airplanes.

“We saw in these two accidents that the crews did not react in the ways Boeing and the FAA assumed they would,” said NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt. “Those assumptions were used in the design of the airplane and we have found a gap between the assumptions used to certify the MAX and the real-world experiences of these crews, where pilots were faced with multiple alarms and alerts at the same time.”

The NTSB’s recommendations were included in Aviation Safety Recommendation Report 19-01. In an accompanying statement, the agency said it was “concerned that the accident pilots’ responses to unintended MCAS operation were not consistent with the underlying assumptions about pilot recognition and response that were used for flight control system functional hazard assessments as part of the Boeing 737 MAX design.”

The statement added that the FAA allows such assumptions “without providing clear direction about the consideration of multiple flight-deck alerts and indications in evaluating pilot recognition and response.”

The NTSB said that, taken together, the safety recommendations to the FAA are intended to “ensure system safety assessments for the 737 MAX (and other transport-category airplanes) that used certain assumptions about pilot response to uncommanded flight control inputs, consider the effect of alerts and indications on pilot response and address any gaps in design, procedures, and/or training.”

The recommendations also call for development and use of “robust tools and methods for validating assumptions about pilot response to airplane failures as part of design certification” and “incorporate system diagnostic tools to improve the prioritization of and more clearly present failure indications to pilots to improve the timeliness and effectiveness of their response.”

The FAA said it would review all seven recommendations.

“The FAA is committed to a philosophy of continuous improvement,” the agency said. “The lessons learned from the investigations into the tragic accidents of Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 will be a springboard to an even greater level of safety.”

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Related Content

2019 FSF Press Releases

Flight Safety Foundation Responds to Latest 737 MAX Hearings

Alexandria, Virginia — In a statement released today in response to the latest congressional hearing…

by FSF Communications Staff

Safety Regulation

‘A Gap’

The NTSB issues recommendations designed to reconcile differences between design-certification assumptions and real-world pilot experiences.

by Linda Werfelman

Safety Briefs

Safety News | October 2019

FAA Head Defends MAX Certification Process | New Delay for Remote ID Rules | and…

by Linda Werfelman

Read more articles

1920 Ballenger Ave., 4th Floor, Alexandria, VA 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Asia Pacific Centre for Aviation Safety
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Work with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2025 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn